Creativity
tools are essential in today’s modern classroom. Not only do students desire to use them daily
in school, but they also afford the highest levels of Bloom’s Taxonomy: evaluating
and creating. Social media is ever
present not just daily, nor hourly, but is available to students every second
they are awake. Creativity tools are not
something that will fade away; moreover, teachers must become aware of how
learning has changed and apply their content and pedagogical practices in such
a way as to reach this technology-based age group. These tools allow students
to apply their content and prove to the teacher the knowledge they have learned
through synthesis and application. Traditional methods of teaching can do the
same thing; however, they do not allow the learning to be student-centered and
inquiry-based, which is what a creativity tool can accomplish.
I
tested iMovie, Animoto, YouTube, and Skype this week. As a person with many apple devices, I found iMovie
much more enjoyable to work in than Animoto.
My iCloud connected automatically, and I was able to incorporate
pictures and videos from previous years without having to place them on a flash
drive or access them from a third party.
Even though there are not a lot of directions, the app is user friendly
and is used with common sense, which is why most people who have apple products
use apple apps as well. Animoto is a
very similar concept as iMovie. Both
allows the user to incorporate pictures or videos and give options for sound
effects. The use of either product in my
classroom would depend on the school district and what type of technology was
available: iPads or Chromebooks. Both
accomplish the same goals; having more knowledge and hands-on experience with Apple
products, I would feel more confident using iMovie in my classroom. This does not mean that there is no value in
Animoto; in fact, I feel it would be easier for younger students to create and
produce a project with it.
Personally,
using Skype would be my preference to connect with others. It is easy to contact someone who is out of
cell phone signal strength but may have internet access. I can see using this in a classroom with
having a classroom virtual pen pal. Both
classes could read a novel and then interact with each other over discussion
questions via Skype. This could also allow
students to connect with professionals or experts in a particular subject area
as a supplement to basic book content knowledge. Seeing the application of the knowledge first
hand in a virtual field trip format can inspire and show relevancy to students.
YouTube
was interesting to research and tech play.
My husband and I both have used YouTube for our may diy projects and find
many answers to things which we are not masters: car mechanics, installing a
shower, moving a shed across our property.
Professionally, I have used YouTube in my classroom to show clips from
tv shows that show certain literary devices: Tim Taylor and Al Borland to show
examples of Foils for characterization purposes. However, I had not given much
thought on YouTube usage for my students.
After thinking through the TPACK model and its application with certain
creativity tools, I realized YouTube could help connect my parents to their children’s’
works in my class and could allow students to review others work.
Traditionally
when teaching Shakespeare, I would read the script in a read-aloud format in
the classroom and then supplement the reading with a professional video of the Act
that had been read. I would review
specific concepts and then test them with traditional paper and pencil. I could do the same thing through creativity
tools. Students could form groups to
rewrite the script in different time periods or settings, then film the
reenactment. They could place the videos
together in iMovie and then upload them to a closed YouTube channel where we
could watch them as a class. I could
grade the project which not only tests their knowledge but their application of
the content through technology. Parents
could then login to the channel and view their child’s creation. Students could also review others work and
see different interpretations of the same material. This allows the student to control their
learning and provide them with options in displaying their knowledge.

No comments:
Post a Comment